X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Why wasn’t Barack Obama more focused in the debate?

4 October 2012

11:39 AM

4 October 2012

11:39 AM

OK, cards on the table: I’m a big Obama fan. I desperately hope he wins next month, and I’m reasonably confident he will. But even to my biased eye, he clearly put in the weaker performance of last night’s debate. He knew his stuff, and had plenty of good points, but threw them out in such a way that none of them really stuck. ‘Is the reason that Governor Romney is keeping all these plans to replace secret because they’re too good?’ would have been a great line had it not been smuggled out at the end of an overlong response. The President’s answers were just too waffling to make an impact.

It’s very rare that I watch Obama speak and think ‘I could’ve said something better’. In fact, I don’t think it’s ever happened before. But it did a few times last night. I know that, as the Americans say, it’s always easy to play Monday morning quarterback, but why didn’t he — when Romney attacked him for not getting bipartisan support for his healthcare reforms — say ‘I’d love to have got some Republican votes, but it’s kind of hard when they say their top priority is denying me a second term, instead of helping the millions of hard-working families around the country’? Congress is massively unpopular, and the Republican Party is not much better off, so taking a shot at both is hardly a risky strategy. And when Romney touted his time as Governor of Massachusetts to prove his own bipartisan credentials, why didn’t Obama hit back with a quote from one of the many Massachusetts legislators who say he was rubbish? He could’ve just picked one from his own campaign ad.

[Alt-Text]


And earlier in the debate, why did Obama let Romney be the only one to talk about growing the economy to reduce the deficit? Why didn’t he respond with ‘Governor Romney is right that we’ve got to grow the economy, but the way to do that isn’t by cutting taxes for millionaires, it’s by investing in American workers, just like we did with the auto industry’? The message might be a bit Ed Balls-y, but it’s also pretty popular — as the Obama camp clearly realises, having made it a big theme of their convention. Indeed, the fact that Obama didn’t deliver a stand-out line about saving General Motors (perhaps contrasting it with one of his favourite Romney lines: ‘Let Detroit go bankrupt’) is almost hard to believe.

I doubt last night’s debate will change the state of the race much — Obama’s still the clear favourite, and that’s not just wishful thinking on my part. But I do hope the President turns up to the next two debates far more engaged and gives far more focused answers. If only he’d managed that last night, we’d all be talking instead about how silly Mitt Romney looked when he said ‘I love Big Bird’.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close