X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Coffee House

Why George Osborne had to kill the mansion tax

7 October 2012

7:02 PM

7 October 2012

7:02 PM

This morning the Mail on Sunday reported that George Osborne has promised there will be no mansion tax, no wealth tax and the council tax freeze will be extended. Homeowners are safe for now, but why has Osborne made that call?

It might be something to do with a past Conservative Party Conference back in 2007 when the party was in a similarly dire situation. The then Shadow Chancellor pledged to cut inheritance tax by increasing the threshold, put Gordon Brown off calling an early election and ended the honeymoon it is now hard to believe he ever enjoyed.

Britain already has the highest property taxes of any developed economy and council tax is desperately unpopular. You could argue that a new, more progressive, property tax would win people over. Council tax isn’t exceptional though. In the United States, property taxes have led to more taxpayer revolts than any other tax. There are very basic reasons why property taxes tend to be unpopular: they are paid as big lump sums and most people feel losing £10 more than earning £10 less (a phenomenon known to psychologists as loss aversion).

[Alt-Text]


The fundamental problem is that people with significant assets don’t necessarily have significant incomes. Particularly later in their life, plenty of people have built up valuable properties over time but don’t make that much money each year. You pay taxes out of your cash income, not your net wealth.

Proponents of the tax have an answer for that one. Apart from the weird idea of imposing the tax at the point of sale, which would make the tax a supplement to the already formidable stamp duty singling out family homes that people own for longer. To quote the Janan Ganesh in the Financial Times, there is “such a thing as equity release”.

Equity release essentially means borrowing to pay the tax until you die. Then it is paid out of your estate. That turns a wealth tax or a mansion tax into an inheritance tax. And, thanks to the cost of equity release policies, a very high inheritance tax. We worked out just how high for the 2020 Tax Commission’s final report, the Single Income Tax:

If someone owned a house worth £500,000 from the age of 55 till they died at 80, a wealth tax of one per cent on its entire value would mean they would have to pay £130,000 – 26 per cent of its value in tax. If they borrowed the £5,000 each year, at a typical interest rate on an equity release policy of around seven per cent, that would mean a total bill to their estate of £343,382, or 69 per cent of its value.

For a property of £2 million, under the same assumptions, the total charge on their estate would be £1,373,529. Assuming the existing Inheritance Tax remained in place, that would further reduce the total value of their estate, equivalent to a very high combined rate of 75 per cent (with no threshold).

You can see how a Chancellor of the Exchequer whose political reputation rests, in large part, on an inspired decision to cut inheritance tax might see a massive hike in the tax as a bit of a bad idea.

Matthew Sinclair is chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close