Coffee House

Lib Dem conference: Danny Alexander admits he knew tuition fees pledge was unaffordable

23 September 2012

11:38 AM

23 September 2012

11:38 AM

Liberal Democrats here in Brighton are divided on the Clegg tuition fees apology. Most of them feel it was worth a try, that it was necessary if the party is to get a hearing on other issues. But one Lib Dem minister has told me that he worries the apology is too complicated. He fears that anger will bubble back up when people realise what a few newspapers didn’t: that Clegg is apologising for making the promise, not breaking it.

On the Sunday Politics today, Danny Alexander conceded that he had signed the fees pledge after he had warned Nick Clegg that it was unaffordable. This is an embarrassing admission. It emphasies that the party leadership ran with the pledge despite knowing that it was a deeply flawed policy. It perhaps explains why Clegg felt the need to apologise: he had been told that this was a promise any British government could not keep.


Defenders of the LibDem leadership say that they were lumbered with the policy by the party, which simply refused to drop it. This is true. But the leadership was not obliged to campaign on it in the way they did. No one forced them to make a video promising an end to broken promises.

UPDATE Here’s the transcript:-

Danny Alexander: We were clear that this was an expensive pledge, that it would be difficult to afford under the financial circumstances that we face as a country. But as a democratic party where our party conference, our elected policy committee and so on have a big role in shaping our manifesto we decided – and I was part of this decision, I was the chair of our manifesto group – to include that policy in our manifesto. We then decided to sign up to that pledge.

 Andrew Neil: What did you tell him [Nick Clegg] and how did he respond, Mr Alexander? You’re filibustering here, what did you tell him and how did he respond?

Danny Alexander: I don’t remember the details of the conversation that took place quite a few years ago, but what I’m saying to you is it was clear that this was a very expensive policy that given the financial circumstances facing the country it would be difficult to afford, and that’s why we took the approach we did in our manifesto, phasing it in over a number of years. But nonetheless, under the current financial circumstances it wasn’t affordable. We made a pledge that we couldn’t keep. We shouldn’t have done that, and that’s why Nick has apologised for it.

AN: Final question, Mr Alexander. You signed the NUS pledge, didn’t you? Was that before or after you warned Mr Clegg it was unaffordable?

DA: I did. Every Liberal Democrat MP signed that pledge. It’s something I regret, I’m sorry for, I wish I hadn’t done, because it wasn’t a promise that we could keep.

AN: Had you already told Mr Clegg it was unaffordable when you signed it?

DA: Well, I signed it during the election campaign. The discussions that you’re referring to took place way before the election campaign

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.

Show comments
  • davebush999

    All these Lib Dems coming out of the woodwork to say that the pledge was not affordable. so why the h**l did they sign it? Either they are liars or incompetents – probably both.

  • Noa

    To climb up onto and then nail yourself to the adjoining cross is a truly remarkable feat.

    Still it lets us look on the bright side of life…

    “we’re sorry, we’re so sorry…”

    repeat, (falsetto and ad nausem).

  • David B

    What a shock politicians make pledges they know they cannot keep. If u did that in a tax return it would be a criminal offence!! The question is did they sign it expecting not to be in government or where they just that short sighted and unable to think beyond the election date. Just like the in/out referendum was clearly a pledge not to be implemented.

    Lets hope all parties learn a pledge must be thought through before it is made. The lib dems where dishonest. Politicians are held in low esteem because the public think they are dishonest.

  • In2minds

    LibDems, has the truth dawned on the EU yet?

    • Boudicca_Icenii

      Seen any flying pigs recently? Nah, thought not.

  • Daniel Maris

    It’s an apology (makeshift construct) for an apology (justification) disguised as an apology (an expression of regret).

    No wonder the Lib Dums have a snake in the grass as their symbol.

  • David Cockerham

    Yes, and they regularly lie through their teeth on green energy policy too, knowing that it is making energy costs far higher than they need to be, causing huge economic damage and great personal hardship, and all to no good effect on climate whatsoever; all just to win the green vote and damn the consequences for the country.

  • foxoles

    No s**t, Sherlock. Tomorrow: Danny Alexander admits he knows that windmills push up energy bills and mean the elderly will freeze.

    • treborc1

      One way to save on pensions.

  • an ex-tory voter

    Who actually gives a flying fcuk what any of the Lib Dems say in Brighton? After all, they are even more of an irrelevance that David Cameron and his bunch. Come the next General Election they will all be losers and deservedly so.

    • treborc1

      But whom will be the winners for god sake do not say labour and the liberals

  • 2trueblue

    Took a while for him to understand the question!! Says it all.