X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

‘Denuded’ Work and Pensions committee sheds little light on Universal Credit

17 September 2012

8:22 PM

17 September 2012

8:22 PM

The Work and Pensions Select Committee was much denuded this evening, chair Anne Begg told the guests: its membership had either been promoted in the reshuffle or had personal crises to attend to. In the end Begg was joined by Andrew Bingham, Stephen Lloyd, Teresa Pearce and Glenda Jackson to interrogate Iain Duncan Smith and Lord Freud about the implementation of universal credit. Their questions seemed rather denuded, too: not of detail, for these MPs do truly know their stuff when it comes to welfare reform, but of a sense of the bigger picture.

During the hearing, which lasted nearly three hours, the Work and Pensions Secretary and his Welfare Reform Minister explained how they planned to encourage claimants to manage their claims online. Duncan Smith suggested this would bring claimants into the 21st century, explaining that ‘what we’re not doing is treating them all as infants’. He dismissed claims that monthly payments of the new benefit would push families into poverty, arguing that most claimants wanted monthly payments and that the days of weekly wage packets at the factory gate had gone.

‘Those days are long gone. For some they are still there, but there’s vast majorities want to go on monthly. We have to get them ready for that. That’s what this is about.’

[Alt-Text]


The pair also outlined the safeguards for vulnerable clients who struggle to manage their own budgets, including announcing that the department is seeking expressions of interest from companies interested in providing products such as ‘jam jar’ bank accounts. They also announced a string of specific concessions for self-employed claimants and those living in supported housing.

This was all very well and good, and the committee members welcomed each announcement. But it was only towards the end of the session, after Duncan Smith had rather wearily expressed some desire for what was turning into an eternal set of questions to end, that Liberal Democrat MP Stephen Lloyd started to talk about the big picture. He urged the Work and Pensions Secretary to work at improving the image of universal credit, so that claimants might begin to see it as a positive thing. Duncan Smith replied that actually he would be spending Thursday explaining aspects of the credit which were currently rather misunderstood to the media. ‘There is a lot of ignorance in the media,’ he told the committee.

One issue the media is growing less ignorant of is the concern in Whitehall about the computer system that will make universal credit actually work. As the Spectator revealed in its leading article last week, Jeremy Heywood is briefing against the reform, saying he is ‘sceptical’ that it will be a success. But aside from admitting that the computer system bridging HMRC and DWP has not yet been tested, the two ministers said very little on this. Perhaps Thursday’s ‘major exercise’ with the media will shed a little more light on what the department is doing to allay Heywood’s fears, if there’s a chance of reassuring the Cabinet Secretary at all at this stage.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close