X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Blogs

Barack Obama Plays it Safe - Spectator Blogs

7 September 2012

4:31 AM

7 September 2012

4:31 AM

I’ll have a fuller, more considered take on Barack Obama’s convention speech in tomorrow’s Scotsman but my initial impression was that this is not one of those Obama speeches people will remember. Doubtless it will be included in some edition of his selected speeches but that will be because of the occasion at which is was delivered, not because it was a magnificent example of his oratorical prowess.

Perhaps the President is a victim of his own success. Expectations for an Obama speech are higher than for other politicians. Nevertheless, when one thinks of all the talking in Charlotte this week you can make a decent case that Obama was outshone by his wife, eclipsed by Bill Clinton and even, in terms of making a case for his re-election, second fiddle to Joe Biden on the night.

Biden in fact gave a speech that, though too long, was pitched directly too Obama’s weakest demographic: blue-collar, white men. This is a strong guy with a spine of steel, Biden said. He’s got your back and you can put your faith in him knowing he’ll deliver.

As for Obama: well, it was mostly pretty familiar. Though he finished strongly there was less rhetoric than might have been expected and, frankly, the speech never quite managed to soar. On Twitter it was not hard to find people comparing it to a State of the Union address and that seemed a fair judgement. This is not a compliment.

[Alt-Text]


So there was a long list of accomplishment and a long list of promises and ample reason given for doubting that Mitt Romney can offer a plausible or even decent alternative. Countering GOP “individualism” Obama offered a defence of citizenship defined by mutual obligation and the ties that bind. There were moments when his speech reminded me of Tony Blair’s enthusiasm for communitarianism.

Times have been tough, Obama said, and the journey has been harder than anyone imagined. But the worst is in the past now and better, brighter times lie ahead. Together we can get there; together we will build this future.

On foreign policy he mocked Mitt Romney’s inexperience. Even dear old Blighty got a mention as “our closest ally” thanks to Romney’s pre-Olympic misteps. So that was nice. Not that this will be a foreign policy election, of course. Which is just as well for Romney, frankly.

A new jobs report is released later today and everyone seems to assume it will contain encouraging news for the President. Perhaps that’s why, despite justified criticism of the lack of detail offered by the GOP in Tampa last week, Obama didn’t offer much of the stuff himself either. Unemployment remains above 8% but good numbers this month will bolster his case that the worst is over, corners have been turned and soon it will be, if you will excuse the reference, Morning in America again. But if the numbers are bad? Well, then this will probably be seen, in hindsight, as a sluggish, defensive speech.

If you were marking the speech out of ten you might struggle to give it more than a six. But perhaps that just means it was as good as it had to be and no more.

In any case, Democrats leave Charlotte with a spring in their step. Their convention has been notably more coherent – and enthused – than the Republicans’ effort in Tampa. It helps that Democrats actually like and believe in their candidate.

Nevertheless, this was a speech with more perspiration and exhortation than one associates with Obama. It was not bad at all but nor was it inspirational. It is unlikely this will matter very much.

More later, I guess, but that’s my first impression.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close