X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Coffee House

Firestarter Francis Maude needs to keep fanning the quango bonfire

22 August 2012

1:30 PM

22 August 2012

1:30 PM

The Prime Minister once promised a ‘bonfire of the quangos’. Although his government has sometimes failed to fulfil expectations, his firestarter in the Cabinet Office, Francis Maude, has managed to make a dent in the 1,000+ organisations that flourished under Labour.

The latest figures released by the Cabinet Office today claim that £1.4bn has saved through the government’s quango reform programme. So far, 106 public bodies have closed, with a further 150 merged down into 70. Among the more quirky ex-quangos  are the Government Hospitality Advisory Committee on the Purchase of Wines, Advisory Committee on National Historic Ships and Advisory Committee on Packaging. In an article for ConservativeHome, Maude outlines his clear test for burning a quango:

I’ve introduced three simple tests that each and every quango must pass to survive. One: does it perform a necessary technical role? Two: does it need to be politically impartial? Three: does it need to act independently to establish facts? If it doesn’t meet these tests we will either scrap it or bring its functions into government.

Once the reform programme is finished — saving a total £2.6bn by 2015 — he has promised to ‘continue to review all remaining quangos to ensure that never again will we end up with so many of these vast bureaucratic and unaccountable bodies’.

[Alt-Text]


But the programme is only on track to close another 100 or so bodies. This leaves 900 quasi-autonomous organisations employing 110,000 workers. The quango cutting should include redundancies, but so far it appears only 16 per cent of quango staff will lose their jobs. Instead, many of the axed employees are shuffling into government departments. The Daily Mail cites the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission, which has officially been abolished. In reality, its functions have been nationalised into the Department for Work and Pensions.

Labour’s John Trickett went on the attack this morning, claiming that the government is creating more quangos through its NHS reforms. There is a whiff of hypocrisy here, as Labour was responsible for the rocketing costs of quangos when in office. The bill for the non-departmental government bodies was £18.6  billion in 1997 but by 2009, this had rocketed up to £38.4 billion .

Although Maude and co may be limited by how many more organisations they can carry out, there are plenty of costs left to tackle. As the Telegraph investigated last year, some quango bosses are still earning as much as £700,00 a year. With public sector spending on the rise, it is more important than ever for Francis Maude to keep fanning the flames of that bonfire of the quangos.

PS: Kiran Stacey makes the good point on the FT’s Westminster blog (£) that we don’t know how much quangos are currently costing. Therefore it is difficult know how ‘good’ these savings are. The last clear indication was the 2009 Cabinet Office report and if the costs of quangos are on along those lines, then the impact Maude’s slash and burn is minimal.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close