X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Books

Compromised by not compromising

24 July 2012

2:51 PM

24 July 2012

2:51 PM

‘In a relationship, when does the art of compromise become compromising?’ Thus spoke Carrie Bradshaw. Such knowledge suggests that I have passed her tipping point; my compromises have compromised me. But, then again, one can’t dissent from Robert Louis Stevenson’s view that ‘compromise is the best and cheapest lawyer’, especially when it comes to relationships. There are worse fates than having to do the washing-up occasionally to a backing of unwanted telly.

Yesterday evening, I had hoped to watch highlights of England’s humiliation at the hands of the South African cricket team, but, alas, was forced to settle for Eastenders. Such is life. In fact, Eastenders wasn’t all that bad. It certainly wasn’t dull. An daringly young woman spent the whole episode giving birth in a chippie. No-one thought to trouble the NHS, and the shop manager was happy to banish his customers to accommodate the nativity. This was good business: I didn’t enjoy my fish and chips amid the ear-splitting depiction of labour. In between screams, the new mother’s downtrodden 53-year-old grandfather overcame life’s misfortunes and London Transport to run the Olympic torch through Albert Square.

This live soap opera was strangely affecting, and it reminded me of how poor artistic and literary coverage of the Olympics has been. Good Olympics books have been few and far between, which is lamentable because there are great stories to tell of the 1908 and 1948 Olympics, even if you are bored rigid by athletics. Those events were planned and run by gentlemen amateurs; a species that is now extinct. The lack of funds ensured that democratic ideals prevailed. In 1948, athletes and assorted hangers-on were lodged in the RAF’s extensive quarters in Uxbridge. No Ozymandian temple for them.

[Alt-Text]


The contrast with the present jamboree could not be starker. I was walking through Grosvenor Square the other day and was surprised to see even the trees marked with proprietary flags and logos. There is a difference between being a host and being a billet, and London has allowed itself to become a billet.

Contrast this with the Diamond Jubilee, which, vocal republicans aside, was underscored by affection and humour. During the pop concert, Madness played Our House on top of Buckingham Palace while images of terraced houses and suburban semis were projected onto the façade of the decaying palace. Every Englishman’s home is his castle. It was an ironic demonstration of national unity; an expression of the qualities which the queen’s endless biographers insist she embodies.

The grace to accept gentle ridicule is fundamental to all institutions in democratic societies, so too adaptability. In these pages earlier this year, Robert Hardman compared the queen’s flexibility on the issue of official merchandise with the IOC’s intransigence. The palace waived the rules and the IOC enforced them, infamously so.

This is not merely about empathy, though that is important. Constitutional monarchy can subsist on mystery but it thrives on humility. This became apparent to me when walking around an exhibition of miniature royal portraits, convened by VZ Gallery (based in the arriviste enclave of Shoreditch, but using a room at the Ritz on this occasion). The miniatures and preliminary sketches were the work of Alexei Maximov, an artist at the forefront of the recent revival in Tsarist enamel painting in Russia. Back in the ‘90s, he was privately commissioned by several European royal houses, including the Windsors, to produce informal portraits. The exhibition was the first time that the work has been displayed publicly, giving those people who were interested an insight into private monarchy. It was a small and unimportant example of the general spirit of inclusion that characterised the Jubilee. However, as I write on this glorious summer’s day, the traffic outside my window is at a livid standstill, while the Olympics-only lane is wide-open.

The Jubilee seemed to be the triumph of compromise. The Olympics will (hopefully) be a great success and a source of national pride for years to come; but its smooth arrival is being compromised by an aversion to compromise.

 

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close