X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Cameron’s attack on Jesse Norman will backfire

11 July 2012

11:30 AM

11 July 2012

11:30 AM

Jesse Norman became the hero of the hour yesterday afternoon when the government admitted defeat against the Tory rebels and dropped the programme motion on Lords reform. Norman was keen to claim the victory for his rebel operation, making an early intervention to say:

‘Let me make it clear from the Conservative benches that the very substantial opposition from within the Conservative party, not just that from Labour, was responsible for the withdrawal of the motion. That should be perfectly clear and reflected in the record.’

As leader of the rebel camp, and a member of the 91 who voted against the second reading of the Bill late last night, Norman was the toast of his colleagues after the programme motion failed. He was even being talked about as a potential future leader of the Conservative party. And then David Cameron turned up.

[Alt-Text]


According to Labour MP Karl Turner, the Prime Minister made a ‘bee line’ for Norman as he was chatting with another MP close to the doors of the chamber. Cameron was ‘finger-pointing and prodding towards Mr Norman’, Turner tweeted. Nicholas Watt filed a story shortly afterwards that quoted one leading rebel describing the Prime Minister as ‘Flashman’, a tag Cameron will not be overjoyed to see return.

There is a possibility that doing this in full sight of other MPs returning from voting was an attempt by Cameron to show the Liberal Democrats that he is taking personal charge of ensuring that MPs will now fall into line and the government can get the consensus that Michael Gove claimed was still possible over the Lords reform legislation. But if, as all the reports suggest, this sounds like the Flashman who appears when the Prime Minister is truly rattled at PMQs, not a piece of acting. 

Sources are briefing this morning that the PM was less annoyed by the rebellion than he was by messages sent by Norman to colleagues which were ‘misrepresenting the PM’s view on the House of Lords’. But giving an MP who was the golden boy among backbenchers a public dressing down simply threatens to damage Cameron’s authority still further by stacking the feeling in the party against him.

The second confrontation that took place was in the Strangers’ Bar, where Norman was told to leave by three whips – Stephen Crabb, Philip Dunne, Bill Wiggin and James Duddridge, according to Watt’s report. This, I understand, was because another colleague was making rather unpleasant threats towards Norman, angered that the whips’ authority had been undermined by the scale of the rebellion. They had been briefing before the vote that there might be 50 rebels, and so a record-breaking rebellion has left them looking a little out of touch with party feeling.

But the whips and Cameron should have been kicking themselves last night after such an inconsistent whipping operation. They started off by suggesting that it would not damage an MP’s career to step out of line on this issue, which sowed the seeds of rebellion. The whips only got tough when that rebellion had put out some pretty strong roots in the party. It was too late for Cameron to give Norman a public dressing down last night, and he will find he regrets it, perhaps even as early as PMQs today.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close