X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Blogs

The Jubilee stewards scandal reveals the flaws of the Work Programme

8 June 2012

10:30 AM

8 June 2012

10:30 AM

It all seemed innocent enough. I even found myself in the rain at Somerset House watching the river pageant (for the kids, you understand). The street party in my road meant I met neighbours I had never spoken to. And the high-kitsch of the Diamond Jubilee concert seemed to give the world a lesson in how not to take yourself too seriously.

But then came Shiv Malik’s scoop on the unpaid Jubilee pageant stewards shivering under the bridges with sodden food and no shelter from the elements. It is hard to imagine a more powerful image of our divided nation. Sometimes a news story emerges which has a symbolic power beyond the mere facts it reports. This is one of them.



The expense of the Jubilee celebrations was always difficult to justify in these straitened times. But crowds of the size witnessed on the Mall on Sunday are difficult to argue with. At least a section of the British public appeared to embrace the absurdity that is the hereditary principle.

[Alt-Text]


The story of the Work Programme stewards came like a slap round the face with a wet packed lunch.

Every week brings a new suggestion that a policy could turn out to be the coalition’s Poll Tax. But of all the recent government reforms, the Work Programme is the most vulnerable because it means so much. Ministers know that if the public loses faith in its ability to put Britain back to work they will not be re-elected.

Those of us running charities who have tried to operate as sub-contractors within the Byzantine Work Programme system have been warning anyone who will listen that the system is at risk of failing the people who need it the most. It was not designed with small charities in mind and it is no surprise that it does not allow them to deliver. But critics of the system should draw no comfort from its troubles. The Work Programme is the only game in town for the long-term employed, who are already understandably sceptical. If employers and charities lose faith, the prime contractors will not be far behind — leaving only the architects of the system within the DWP.

The Work Programme really is too big to fail. Those within the government who remain ideologically wedded to the payment by results system at the heart of the Work Programme need to start asking themselves if the pressure on contractors to deliver will inevitably lead to abuses such as those witnessed under London’s bridges over Jubilee weekend.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close