X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

MPs squabble over their own phone hacking report

1 May 2012

12:48 PM

1 May 2012

12:48 PM

The education select committee reported earlier, but it is the report of another select committee that
will get all the attention today. The culture, media and sport select committee has just delivered its verdict on the phone hacking scandal, naming names and
apportioning blame — or at least in theory it has. In practice, ‘its verdict’ may be stretching it a bit. During the press conference just now, the individual members of the
committee could barely put up a united front at all.

[Alt-Text]


There are the parts of the report that they all agree upon: that the former News International employees Les Hinton, Tom Crone and Colin Myler misled the committee in their testimony, for instance.
And then there are the parts that they disagree upon among themselves. The most vexatious of these appears to be an amendment, submitted by Tom Watson, to the effect that ‘Rupert Murdoch is
not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company.’ Six members of committee voted for this amendment (the five Labour members and the one Lib Dem), while four
voted against it (the four Tories, excepting chairman John Whittingdale) — so it made it into the report. The same split then occurred when it came to voting for the report as a whole.

This resulted in a quite extraordinary press conference. Tom Watson rattled through a speech stuffed with barbs against Murdoch, and even quoted Bob Dylan for good measure. But then his fellow
committee member Philip Davies stressed that these were not the views of the entire body, and added that ‘some people have got carried away with themselves’. Louise Mensch suggested
that she would have voted for the report in its entirety, if it hadn’t been for Watson’s Murdoch amendment. The Labour MPs came to their comrade’s defence. And on and on it went.

Seems to me that the accusations levelled at Hinton, Crone and Myler are very serious in themselves — but I expect that the ‘not a fit person’ attack will seize the headlines
tomorrow. The political question is whether this will wash back to damage the Tories as the Hunt row continues, or perhaps the political class as a whole. But, whatever, there’s little sense
of catharsis after today’s report. This messy affair continues.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close