X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Cameron tries to reassure his backbenchers ahead of the Queen’s Speech

9 May 2012

9:05 AM

9 May 2012

9:05 AM

The newspapers are awash with articles previewing today’s
Queen’s Speech, but few stand out as much as James Chapman’s
interview with David Cameron
in the Daily Mail. Here, Cameron does something that he rarely does: complain about life with the Lib Dems. There was that one time when he claimed the Tories would be ‘making further steps’ on welfare and immigration
were they in a majority government, of course — but this goes further than that. He tells the paper, ‘There is a growing list of things that I want to do but can’t.’

As for the specific items on that list, Cameron mentions ECHR reform, employment regulation and the recognition of marriage in the tax system. For the first two of these, he just leaves it hanging
that a Tory government would be able to achieve more by itself. But for the last, he holds a significant scrap of reassurance up to his party. ‘Clearly on things like recognising marriage in
the tax system, I got a specific carve-out in the Coalition agreement that we could propose something which the Lib Dems don’t have to vote for, but I still think we’d get
through,’ he says; before adding that, ‘That’s something that will be done this Parliament. But obviously in a majority Conservative government, these things would be more
straightforward.’

[Alt-Text]


It’s not all about differentiating the Tories from the Lib Dems, though, as Cameron also highlights that the coalition is united on fixing the economy, etc. And this, I imagine, will
increasingly be the way of it from now on: emphasising unity on the core task of deficit reduction, while suggesting dissimilarities around the edges. In the lifespan of a normal government, this
would be about the time when they can no longer rely on blaming the last lot, and have to do more to set out the future they want to see. For a coalition, that process creates divide almost as a
matter of course, given that both of its constituent parts see the future differently.

Whether Cameron’s intervention will placate his more disgruntled backbenchers is another question entirely. My guess is that they’ll deploy the point made by Liam Fox a couple of weeks ago: that the Lib Dems represent only ‘one-sixth’ of the
coalition, so they should expect Tory thinking to prevail more often than not.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close