X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Blogs

Making the Work Programme work

11 February 2012

6:28 PM

11 February 2012

6:28 PM

Last week David Milband showed some real class when he presented the recommendations from his Commission on Youth Unemployment. This was a sober and intelligent review of the crisis and the government would do
well to take note. He has welcomed the introduction of job subsidies under the new Youth Contract, which will come in from April, but is right to urge a boost in the number of these that will be
made available to employers. His idea to set up Youth Employment Zones in hotspots of worklessness around the country is also a solid idea that should be lifted by ministers. One element that was
not highlighted by the report was self-employment. It makes sense for the government to pay for emergency stop-gap jobs at a time of low growth, but for recovery to be sustainable new jobs with
need to be created by start-up businesses. Unemployed graduates in particular should be encouraged to set up their own businesses: to my mind this is where any large-scale pump priming from state
funds should take place. I would also like to see the Downing Street nudge unit delivering a huge poke in the ribs to the banks to persuade them to invest in graduate start-ups.

The Miliband report is just one of a number of recent interventions in this area. The National Audit Office warned that
the government had been over-optimistic about the ability of the Work Programme to deliver. I am a glass-half-full man myself and I hope the new payment-by-results system delivers. But the warnings
from the National Audit Office are sobering for those of us working to put young people back to work. The huge private corporations such as Serco, G4S and A4e given the job of delivering the Work
Programme have been told they should not be tempted to maximise their profits by creaming off those easiest to get back to work, reducing the quality of the services for the unemployed or
mistreating subcontractors. There are indications that this is all happening already so now is the time for Iain Duncan Smith and his team to be ultra-vigilant.

[Alt-Text]


The Work and Pensions Secretary can not have been happy with the views of Public Accounts Committee chair Margaret Hodge on the
welfare-to-work provider A4e. The provider was described as having an ‘abysmal’ record. It’s not
often that welfare-to-work gets the Daily Mail treatment, but the paper turned its fire on A4e’s founder Emma Harrison after it was discovered she
pocketed over £8 million last year, although one feels the paper is more furious at the alleged crime of living in a ‘posh commune’.

This story will not be going away any time soon. I hear advisers in Downing Street have become fixated on the problem of youth unemployment, as well they might. As one-in-five creeps towards
one-in-four, it becomes increasingly difficult to pin the blame on school and college leavers themselves. The real problem is that the Work Programme was never designed to tackle youth unemployment
(the belief was that most young people would largely find their own way back into the job market and as a result the payments for providers to get under-24s back to work are simply not attractive
enough ).

Now the former head of Serco’s Welfare to Work programme, Richard Johnson, has launched an astonishing attack on the Work Programme in the Guardian claiming that contracts were awarded on the basis of price rather than quality and urging
the DWP to come up with a Plan B in the event of the failure of the scheme.

The Work Programme was dreamt up in opposition and was designed for a buoyant jobs market. The time has come for ministers as the DWP to listen rather than preach and change course if necessary.
This issue is too important for ideological point-scoring, as David Miliband has so admirably shown. 

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close