X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Osborne’s carbon conceits

3 October 2011

3:33 PM

3 October 2011

3:33 PM

George Osborne told a Conservative Party increasingly wary of expensive climate policies
that Britain needs to "cut [its] carbon emissions no slower but also no faster than our fellow countries in Europe. That’s what I’ve insisted on in the recent carbon
budget."  What he actually insisted on was what Chris Huhne described as "a review of progress in early
2014 to ensure our own carbon targets are in line with the EU’s".  Even if that review is serious, and energy intensive industries have every reason to be sceptical, it is only
going to hold our policy to the same standard as today.  The current targets require us to cut our emissions faster than our European competitors, and the policies we are adopting to meet them
are far more draconian.

Just look at our current 2020 target.  Here is a graph from the European Commission which shows how Britain is cutting emissions more aggressively than Germany, France, Italy or Spain —
much more aggressively than the EU average.  

[Alt-Text]


There is every sign that new targets will follow this kind of pattern.  When Ministers talk about wanting to shift the EU emissions target from a 20 per cent cut to a 30 per cent cut, the
Committee on Climate Change expects that will mean a 42 per cent target for Britain.  Britain is mandated to cut its emissions more and, unless things change, will continue to have to cut them
more than our European competitors.

At the same time, the policies are costing us more.  As I pointed out in an earlier post,
Citigroup expect that we will have to invest more to meet environmental targets than all of our major European competitors put together.

We have the most ambitious renewable energy target and we’re installing lots of very expensive offshore wind to meet it.  And we’ve just introduced a carbon floor price that will make the
European Union Emissions Trading System more expensive for us and, because there will be fewer emissions from Britain, will reduce the carbon price and the cost in other countries.

Of course, we aren’t just competing with other European countries and the disparity between what we’re doing and the actions of the major emitters (the United States, India and China) is stark.
Politicians here should be honest about the degree to which Britain is out on its own in the vanguard of radical climate policy.

Matthew Sinclair is Director of the Taxpayers’ Alliance and author of Let them eat
carbon
.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close