X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Blogs

A piece of illiberal silliness

19 September 2011

4:50 PM

19 September 2011

4:50 PM

Memories are short in journalism, but reading about the attempts by the Met to force the
Guardian to hand over source material in the Hackgate case, reminded me of a case the same newspaper group fought over a decade ago.

Bizarrely, the story isn’t in the Guardian’s online archive, which doesn’t go back far enough. But here’s the report of the original hearing in The Independent.

Libya, spooks and a renegade MI5 officer: the story had it all.

“In a further crackdown on leaks from the renegade MI5 officer David Shayler, the Government launched a court action yesterday against two newspapers. It is part of the most aggressive legal
campaign by a government to stop an intelligence leak since Margaret Thatcher won the Spycatcher injunctions in the 1980s.

The Observer and The Guardian were required to appear at the Old Bailey as the Special Branch demanded that journalists’ notes, documents and e-mails be handed over. Ian Leist, for the Metropolitan
Police, said: "This application … arises in the continuing inquiry into breaches of the Official Secrets Act by David Shayler … who is presently believed to be residing in
France."

Government is trying to stop Mr Shayler, 33, leaking more top-secret information. There have been a number of government-inspired actions against papers that have printed Mr Shayler’s allegations.
Last week Julie Ann Davies, a Kingston University student and supporter of Mr Shayler, was arrested under the Official Secrets Act. The Special Branch is seeking the person who posted a secret MI6
document on an internet site.

Yesterday’s action was triggered by a recent Observer report saying it had the names of the two MI6 officers Mr Shayler said had been involved in an assassination attempt against Colonel Muammar
Gaddafi, the Libyan leader, in 1996. After publication, police contacted the paper, asking the reporter, Martin Bright, to hand over notes of the conversation with Mr Shayler.

The police said Mr Bright was being investigated under Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, which is used when damage to national security by a journalist is alleged. The police also asked for a
letter from Mr Shayler published by The Guardian on 17 February.

The newspapers, in line with the journalists’ code of ethics, refused to hand over the material. The police went to the Old Bailey under terms of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act to request a
production order. Michael Tugendhat QC, for the papers, told Judge Martin Stephens that the police had failed to make a case in court.”

We lost at the Old Bailey, but three months later were victorious at judicial review, when a certain judge spoke up  for the freedom of the press citing Voltaire and Pitt the Younger. That man
was a certain Igor Judge, who now sits as Lord Chief Justice. Perhaps he could have a quiet word with the new head of the Met and tell him not to be so silly.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close