X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

The Lucifer Effect

2 June 2011

11:51 AM

2 June 2011

11:51 AM

Today’s papers are full of comment on the brilliant Panorama exposé of care
home abuse. But none have mentioned what jumped out at me: the parallels between this and the Stanford Prison Experiment. The way that the
tattooed Wayne treated his mentally ill patients is sickening — but, to me, this is not just a story about human evil. It’s a story about how institutionalisation brings out the evil in
people, and that this evil is far closer to the surface than we like to admit. Philip Zimbardo, a psychology professor at Stanford, randomly divided 25 volunteers to play the roles of prisoners and
guards in a poorly-regulated, mock prison. Before too long, the "guards" were inflicting torture on their "prisoners", who were taking the beating and even ganging up on other
prisoners at the guards’ request. It was stopped, at the request of Zimbardo’s girlfriend who feared even he was getting caught up in it. That was in 1972, and in 2004 Zimbardo wrote a
brilliant book, The Lucifer Effect, about this phenomenon.

What we saw in Panorama was criminal and deplorable. But were the people especially wicked, or sadistic? Perhaps. But they were also bored, paid £16k a year and operating in an environment
where abuse had become the norm. And this applies in all manner of situations. Put 50 boys aged 11 to 18 together in an ill-regulated boarding house, and it’ll turn into a massive game of
Lord of the Flies. No one (well, almost no one) believes that that Germany was an especially
wicked country, predisposed to Nazism. It was subjected to an almighty economic shock which Hitler exploited with his creed of National Socialism. Slavery was a norm pretty much the world over,
before Wilberforce and his predecessors raised objections. And that wasn’t because mankind was evil, just that it had been inured to evil.

[Alt-Text]


I can feel CoffeeHousers revving up to denounce me for moral relativism, saying that man is a hapless victim of his environment. That’s not my position. There are always conscientious
objectors, and this groundbreaking Panorama was made possible by a former guard at Winterbourne View who risked his job and blew the whistle. Germany had its von Schwanenfelds. My point is that institutional environments are very good at incubating the dark side of human
nature: what Lynndie England did at Abu Ghraib was deplorable, but it is explained not just by the evil of one woman. It’s explained by the system that incubated and nurtured this evil, and
allowed this to happen.

That’s why the response to the Panorama episode should not simply be to lock up the "nurses" caught abusing the patients. It should be to look at how these institutions have been
allowed to operate in this way. To look at the way that, as Zimbardo says, "powerful but subtle situational forces can seduce
people into evil". the government’s priority should be to identify the "situational forces" at work in care homes and similar institutions — and remove them, without
delay.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close