X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

The Pope reopens the international aid debate

3 February 2011

2:47 PM

3 February 2011

2:47 PM

Spare a dime for a travelling Ponfiff? The Department for International Development can
– and then some. According to their latest accounts, they funnelled
£1.85 million of cash across to the Foreign Office to help pay for the Pope’s visit to Britain last September. The money didn’t specifically come out of their ring-fenced aid budget, but it
would normally have gone towards DfID operations overseas. "Somewhat surprising," is how one member of the international development select committee has put it.

Whatever your take on the Pope’s visit, this is still a story which reopens the wider debate about development spending. For many people, I’d imagine, it doesn’t make sense for the British
government to be pushing ahead with overseas handouts when we are enduring cuts and tax hikes back home – and that goes doubly so when the money appears to be misdirected. Yet, for the
coalition, foreign aid remains a priority. In his Spending Review statement, George Osborne emphasised that, "this Coalition
Government will be the first British government in history, and the first major country in the world, to honour the [0.7% GDP] commitment on international aid." If we transpose his words into
graph form:

[Alt-Text]



But what about other countries? Sadly, the latest statistics only cover up until 2009 – but that’s enough to reveal some of the main trends. First up, Osborne was being unfair to a cohort of
Scandinavian countries, as well as to Holland, when he said we will be the first "major country" to hit the 0.7 per cent aid target – they managed it a couple of years ago. Whereas
countries such as the US, Japan, Germany and Australia are still some distance from it:


If we compare that to what each country spent in 2008, we had the third biggest real terms increase in aid spending. Many other countries were already cutting:


Speak to coalitioneers, and some boast that we are now among only a handful of major countries to be increasing aid spending in real terms. The question is whether that is something we should be
proud of, or whether it is an act of government folly. Today’s news about the Papal visit – even if those funds weren’t directly from the aid budget – will do nothing to strengthen the
former case.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close